Thursday 23 February 2006

How to Sniff Out a Rotten Standardista

JUST LIKE THE STINK OF A THREE DAY OLD FISH the arguments about standardistas preaching to the choir, being arrogant and generally being long past their due date persist.

In many cases, these arguments are useless and wrong. A good standardista works hard to educate as well as advocate. A fresh standardista understands that the world is filled with a wide range of people of different skill sets, talents and circumstances. A committed standardista understands the reasons the Web standards movement exists.

He or she knows the ideal: We must keep the visionary aspects of the Web intact via interoperability, platform and device independence, global access and accessibility to all. We must also know the history that brought us to the movement and the reasons and benefits as to why Web standards advocacy is critical to the solid growth of the World Wide Web.

But to be fair, there are some rotten standardistas in Web standards land. Fortunately, I don’t know too many of them despite my exposure and as some might point out, that I happen to be a big fish in the standards pond, but I do know they exist.

I’ve identified three primary types of rotten standardistas. Hopefully, this will begin to help us identify and clarify the type of standardista we want to avoid, as well as avoid being.

  • The Bitch and Moan but Never Does. This rancid type is akin to those individuals who have the right to vote not voting and then bitching about a current, legitimately voted-in regime. Standardistas who never do can be found ranting about the evils of Microsoft, the fact that CSS can suck, and that XHTML is limited semantically. The rotten standardista leaves it at the rant, unlike the much more savory standardista who might actually share the same feelings. But the unstinky standardista articulates the same upsets to the world in ways that are helpful to others via education, through discussion rather than proselytization, and by means of bridge-building instead of bomb dropping. The smelly Bitch and Moan folk really aren’t forwarding the discussion and largely do not deserve your attention.
  • I’m a Fucked Up Human in Need of a Tribe. Okay, so there are some good standardistas who probably fall into this category, myself included. But the fetid standardistas who float into this column are only calling themselves a standards advocate because for some strange reason, it’s perceived by some that being a standardista is cool! This category of nasty is often related to and has many of the habits of the Bitch and Moan type, but often is far more ignorant and couldn’t be bothered to learn enough to bitch in the first place. They also don’t deserve your attention.
  • I’m Better than You Because my Site Validates. This breed of stink may be the worst of all. You can identify this type, apart from the particularly sulphur-like smell, because they are just plain mean and arrogant. The Better than You standardista finds it pleasurable to insult people who are struggling with the learning curve despite their willingness to learn; berate those who are misinformed by virtue of circumstance rather than chosen ignorance; and who poke fun at people who make decisions based on environmental issues rather than just following Web standards because they think standards are good. A great example of this would be someone who criticizes those hard working designers and developers who can’t achieve validation because of external circumstances such as CMSs and ad servers. You know the kind. Don’t avoid the I’m Better than You types, call them out because they’re doing a lot of harm.

The Web standards movement is necessary for the positive growth and long-term health of the Web. I only hope that if I ever start getting a bit smelly, someone will have the kindness of heart to take me aside and let me know I need to freshen up, or perhaps find another pond in which to swim.

Until that time, let’s help each other reduce the rank, manage the malodorous, and free the foul by supporting each other in positive, productive and inclusive ways as we wade through these murky, muddy days.

Filed under:   general
Posted by:   Molly | 08:01 | Comments (81)

Comments (81)


  2. molly i want to make love to u

    Q: What’s this web site?

    A: I’m Molly E. Holzschlag, and this web site shares my web development work and personal thoughts. Think of it as a personality site. Given that, one hopes I have an interesting enough personality to keep you entertained for at least a little while.

  4. Pingback: WD06 - Day 4 Musings at Mad Web Blog

  5. thanks for sharing.

  6. ……………………………….

  7. ekle site ekle hemen ekle

  8. Pingback: Will The UK Government Shut Down The Queen’s Web Site? « UK Web Focus

  9. What is a standardista? I have lived for over 50 years in an english speaking country and have never heard that word until now. If you are going to use obscure language… DEFINE YOUR TERMS!… so that we the reader know waht you are talking about.

  10. BTW: who gives a rats ass about web development except for computer nerds. The human race is better off with out the web and computres in general. Such trivial preoccupations exist to feed technocracies (companies who benefit from computer usage). They do not benefit human kind in general. They become obsessions with some and preoccupations in general. And they distract us from things that are much more important to our welfare. My answer to condescending, patronizing, arrogant computer nerd is to punch them in the face. They are upset by the punch but at least they drop their arrogance. And believe me most computer geeks, pussy boy software programmers and others who think the WWW is the “be all, end all” for human existance are usually flacid physical weeklings… “ONE PUNCH and their out” types. That someone so physically vulnerable would dare to condescend on others who don’t share their interests and aptitudes is audacious beyond belief! How do I know? I was victmized for over a week by some suck hole who was hired to assist me with computer skills. This was a “teacher” of some Oracle/Novell networking technology, claimed to have all kinds of degrees and constantly berated and insulted others who “won’t keep up” or “wasted his time”. He was a computer bully. He was so arrogant that he refused to call them computers. He kept calling them “work stations” I told him that the work station was the who desk area. He then embarassed me in front of my peers and among other things told me I was a “train wreck” because I couldn’t keep up and “why do I bother?” and that I was wasting his and everyones time. Well, I clocked him right in the bazoo. Remember that this kind of talk had been going on for some days. have you ver been pestered by a relentless mosquito until you are ready to go mad? This ass clown coward fell down and was stunned then proceeded to wimper and finally run. But it was so good to see such an instant attitude adjustment. He later threatened to sue until I told him that I’d report his way of speaking to the course officials and he might lose his job. Coward.

  11. Oh my, i appreciate this is an old article but i cannot stand accessibility gurus! what a waste of time and resources.

  12. my mind mixed 🙁

  13. I’m grateful for all the standardists, even the crappy ones. Perhaps Ted’s threat to tell his mom brings into focus another sub-category…
    In any case, I wish him success in quitting the habit of grinding his teeth in the car 🙂

  14. thanks for your sharing

  15. video izlicen gorcen thanks.

  16. youtube izle iste 🙂

  17. video mdeo zart zurt

  18. canlı canlı tube 🙂

  19. güzel sözler var iste

  20. kısa kısa sözler var

  21. muhabbete gel vatandas 🙂

  22. Pingback: thinkJavache » Web development for students

  23. Molly, you have serious ego problems. Don’t worry about the way other people are.
    BTW what is with the “standardista” terminology. (99.99% of people have never heard of that term. Don’t make up bullshit words. You (all web developers included) are not important enough to invent new words and your existence doesn’t warrant the mutilation of english vocabulary.

  24. thanks for sharing.

← Older Comments

Upcoming Travels